Talk:Council of the European Union
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Council of the European Union article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Council of the European Union has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composition
[edit]Neither in the opening nor the "Composition" section is it ever explicitly described how the Council is elected or appointed. Could someone who understands this with proper sourcing add this basic information about the formation and composition of this body? Criticalthinker (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this, now. Though, I'm still trying to figure out the write terminology to make this more clear to describe how national ministers are Council minister by virtue of being their country's ministers.
- In any case, I have an additional question. The Council of the EU apparently plays a role in formally proposing candidates to be EU Commissioners. But it is not clear in which configuration they meet to make those proposals. Does anyone have any online sources that explain this? I've looked at the Treaty and various EU webpages, but this part of the procedure in appointing a new commission is not specifically laid out. Criticalthinker (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Link to European Union
[edit]There is no link in the text to European Union anywhere. Lots of links to sub-pages but none to the organisation itself. Pkoppenb (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- I think the lead is too short and does not summarise all aspects of the article. The citations in the lead can be removed if the information is in the article body.
- There is a single source orange banner at the top of "Foreign affairs", which has been there since 2015.
- There are uncited statements throughout the article.
I anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for raising the concern. I took care of the easy one: the Foreign Affairs section already had many sources. I likely do not have time to address the other concerns. meamemg (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- GA-Class European Union articles
- Top-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles